1.How many viewers are estimated to have watched the YouTube video?
Actually I don’t know how many viewers use it, but there are whole people around me use it to watch video.
2. How would you rate the video?
Is it of high quality in technical terms? Is it interesting aesthetically egg camera angles, use of light, the narrative, and so on?
Yeah I think it is a kind of high quality in technical terms.
And it is interesting for his camera angles, the angle showed us that the view for real people and for the interesting things that people did.
Does it raise interesting socio-cultural issues?
Of course it will raise interesting socio-cultural issues for audiences such as sex, violence, substance abuse, profanity, impudence or other types of mature content. A particular issued rating is called a certification.
3. Do you think it deserved the attention that it received from the internet community?
Not really, maybe other video service can also do what YouTube do, but you will see some competences on the internet between YouTube and some other video service
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_services this address will show you the difference between YouTube and some other video service
Hi Christina,
回覆刪除interesting comments. When yopu consider the technical qualities of the fils compare them with films we all thing are really good in those terms eg the things you see on TV, ads, or movies. Are the films really expertly done in terms of camera angles, lighting etc? When you discuss social issues try to be more specific -can you use examples relevant to HK?
Carol
I have already give an example today,and thank you for your comment!
回覆刪除